Tom, Kate, Josh, Mary -
On our summary viewgraphs from the Chicago meeting (page 35)
<http://www.fusiongrid.org/work/meetings/ord-200108/chicago.pdf>
one option listed is writing to MSSQL via MDSplus. Is
this the same as Josh's number (3)? If not, is this still
an option? My memory from the Chicago meeting is that this
was our best option if the Globus on Windows is delayed.
- david
> > Globus on Windows: I just talked to the person in charge of our MS
>> implementation; this project is just starting. He says he will be able to
>> give us an idea of some timelines after November 29th. As I remember we
>> discussed some sort of backup plan for running a relational database server
>> if we don't have Globus on Windows. Could somebody remind me the details of
>> that "patch" and how long it would be good for?
>>
>Kate --
> I am not sure what 'patch' you are referring to. Until we can run
>globus applications on windows
>we could take several different approaches:
>
>1) wait
>2) use a non windows underlying database for demonstration purposes
>3) sslwrap the database communications and do all of the globus stuff on
>a remote machine via the wrapped port.
>
>I would not be very enthusiastic about choice 2 since the work would
>just have to be repeated on the final platform in the end.
>
>Josh Stillerman
===============================================================================
This message was sent to the SciDAC National Fusion Collaboratory (NFC)
workers list nfc-workers. Visit the Collaboratory at
<http://www.fusiongrid.org/>.
To unsubscribe from this list, please send a message to
majordomo@fusion.gat.com with the following text in the *body* of the
message: unsubscribe nfc-workers
David P. Schissel: <schissel@fusion.gat.com> <http://fusion.gat.com/~schissel/>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.1 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 15:40:41 PST